Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Banc of America Securities Healthcare Conference In Brief

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

Boston Scientific: Firm says it will announce a string of strategic investments in the second half of the year, including a deal related to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging technology. "In the second and third quarter you will hear of a plethora of new alliances and acquisitions that we are really already close to accomplishing," CFO Larry Best tells investors during an April 3 presentation in Las Vegas. Later this year, Boston Scientific will unveil new technology to move IVUS into the hands of more "mainstream" cardiologists in the cath lab, giving them enhanced imaging and the more precise placement of stents in blood vessels. Separately, Boston Scientific believes that an unfavorable verdict regarding its litigation with Cook over the licensing of paclitaxel-application technology to Guidant would not significantly hurt the firm's competitive prospects in the drug-eluting stent arena. "If it goes our way, great, if it doesn't go our way, there is not a lot of downside," Best comments. Regarding Guidant's recent licensing agreement with Novartis for its everolimus compound, Boston Scientific says that it could have licensed the compound first, eventually deciding against it. "Novartis shopped around a Rapamycin-like drug, we had the perfect opportunity to get that as another compound and we chose not to for a lot of reasons," Best says. The exec cites the firm's confidence in paclitaxel, potential intellectual property issues, and the fact that the drug is not approved anywhere in the world as the reasons for passing on the compound...

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT016360

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel