Scrip is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Bristol-Myers scoops Inhibitex for $2.5bn

This article was originally published in Scrip

Executive Summary

As predicted in the latest Scrip Pharma Trends, the hepatitis C space is hotting up further. Less than two months after Gilead Sciences offered an eye-watering $11 billion to buy Pharmasset, Bristol-Myers Squibb is acquiring Inhibitex for $26 a share, valuing the company at $2.5 billion. The offer represents a 163% premium to the $9.87 Inhibitex share price at the close of markets on 6 January. The Inhibitex board has agreed to not solicit any competing offers for its company.

You may also be interested in...



Merck's Write-Down Of Phase II Nuc Illustrates Current Reality In HCV

While a dwindling patient base and pricing pressures are depleting the market opportunity in hepatitis C, Merck's decision also may result from regulatory dialogue potentially delaying the start of a Phase III study.

MoCRA Registrants Encouraged By Glimpse Into Cosmetics Direct Portal, But Apprehensions Remain

Jessica O’Connell, partner at Covington & Burling, is getting questions from clients about the electronic system the FDA plans to launch in coming weeks for cosmetics manufacturers to register facilities and list products as required by new cosmetics regulations. It remains to be seen how hard the 29 December 2023 deadline will be for companies to get their information submitted.

Copay Accumulators: Pending CMS Reg May Offer More Clarity After Judge Limits Scope

Programs only allowed for brands with generic competition under court ruling, but related programs such as copay maximizers and so-called ‘alternative funding’ programs are not directly impacted by the decision.

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

SC015819

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel